Skip to content

Data Collection Exposure

5 automated security scanners


Purpose: The Event Registration Data Scanner is designed to identify and report publicly exposed attendee lists, speaker information, and registration details on a given domain. This can help in detecting unauthorized access and potential data breaches, ensuring the security of sensitive information.

What It Detects:

  • Public Attendee Lists: Scans for publicly accessible pages containing attendee names, affiliations, or contact information.
  • Speaker Information Disclosure: Identifies pages that expose speaker details such as bios, presentations, and contact information.
  • Registration Details Exposure: Detects publicly available registration forms or data dumps containing user information.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., acme.com)

Business Impact: This scanner is crucial for organizations managing events or conferences, as it helps in identifying potential security vulnerabilities that could lead to unauthorized access and data breaches. Properly securing such information can significantly reduce the risk of data theft and protect the reputation of the organization.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: Exposure of sensitive attendee and speaker details without proper authorization mechanisms.
  • High: Public availability of registration forms or data dumps, potentially leading to unauthorized access.
  • Medium: Weak security headers that do not provide adequate protection against common web vulnerabilities.
  • Low: Presence of outdated TLS versions or weak cipher suites in the SSL/TLS configuration.
  • Info: Informational findings regarding DNS records and basic HTTP security practices.

Example Findings:

  • A public page containing attendee names and contact details could lead to unauthorized access, potentially compromising personal information.
  • Publicly accessible registration forms without adequate encryption or authentication mechanisms pose a significant risk of data breaches.


Purpose: The Analytics Dashboard Exposure Scanner is designed to identify and report publicly accessible analytics dashboards that may contain sensitive metrics, user behavior data, and business intelligence information. This can lead to unauthorized access and potential misuse of the exposed data.

What It Detects:

  • Publicly Accessible Dashboards: Identifies URLs where analytics dashboards are publicly accessible without authentication, including common paths like /dashboard, /analytics, and /reports.
  • Security Headers Absence or Misconfiguration: Checks for the presence and correctness of security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to ensure that dashboards are protected against attacks.
  • TLS/SSL Vulnerabilities: Scans SSL/TLS configurations for outdated protocols (e.g., TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1) and insecure cipher suites (e.g., RC4, DES, MD5), ensuring the use of strong encryption standards and up-to-date protocol versions.
  • DNS Record Misconfigurations: Analyzes DNS records for mismanagement or exposure, including patterns in TXT, MX, NS, CAA, and DMARC records that may indicate potential vulnerabilities.
  • Open Ports and Services: Scans for open ports commonly used by analytics services (e.g., port 80, 443, 8080) to identify running services that may expose sensitive data.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., acme.com)

Business Impact: Detecting unauthorized access and potential misuse of sensitive data stored in analytics dashboards is crucial for maintaining the security and integrity of business information. It helps organizations prevent data breaches and comply with regulatory requirements such as GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: Identifies publicly accessible dashboard URLs without authentication that may lead to unauthorized access.
  • High: Detects missing or weak security headers that could expose dashboards to attacks.
  • Medium: Scans for outdated SSL/TLS protocols and insecure cipher suites, which can be bypassed in transit.
  • Low: DNS record misconfigurations might not directly impact data exposure but indicate potential management issues.
  • Info: Open ports scanning results are informational unless they reveal running services that could expose sensitive data.

Example Findings:

  1. A dashboard at https://example.com/dashboard is publicly accessible without any authentication, posing a critical risk of unauthorized access to sensitive information.
  2. The domain uses outdated SSL/TLS protocol versions (e.g., TLSv1.0) and insecure cipher suites (e.g., RC4), which are highly susceptible to attacks and should be urgently upgraded for enhanced security.

Purpose: The Survey Data Exposure Scanner is designed to identify and report publicly accessible survey results and respondent information from platforms such as SurveyMonkey and Qualtrics. It performs a comprehensive analysis of DNS records, HTTP responses, TLS configurations, and other relevant data to detect potential exposure risks.

What It Detects:

  • Publicly Accessible Survey Results: Identifies URLs that allow access to survey results without proper authentication, indicating a risk of unauthorized data exposure.
  • Respondent Information Leakage: Scans for publicly available respondent data or links leading to such information, highlighting the potential leakage of sensitive personal data collected through surveys.
  • Security Headers Analysis: Examines HTTP security headers to ensure they are properly configured, which is crucial for protecting survey data from various attacks and leaks.
  • TLS/SSL Configuration Issues: Inspects SSL/TLS certificates and configurations for vulnerabilities such as outdated protocols, weak cipher suites, and other TLS issues that could compromise the security of survey data.
  • DNS Record Analysis: Analyzes DNS records to ensure proper configuration and identify potential misconfigurations that might expose survey data.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): The primary domain to analyze, such as acme.com. This input is essential for performing DNS record analysis, HTTP security headers analysis, TLS/SSL configuration analysis, and other related checks.

Business Impact: Detecting publicly accessible survey results and respondent information can significantly impact an organization’s data security posture by reducing the risk of unauthorized access to sensitive data. Properly securing this data is crucial for maintaining trust with stakeholders and complying with relevant data protection regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: Conditions that lead to critical severity include severe misconfigurations in DNS, HTTP headers, TLS/SSL settings, which could result in immediate exposure of sensitive survey data without authentication.
  • High: High-severity findings involve significant risks such as missing or improperly configured security headers and outdated SSL/TLS protocols, posing a substantial threat to the integrity and confidentiality of survey data.
  • Medium: Medium-severity issues pertain to less critical vulnerabilities like weak cipher suites or incomplete DNS records that may not directly expose sensitive information but still pose potential risks in an interconnected digital environment.
  • Low: Low-severity findings are informational, such as the presence of a deprecated protocol in DNS settings, which while not immediately dangerous, could be part of broader security issues affecting overall data exposure.
  • Info: Informational findings include general misconfigurations or minor issues that do not directly impact data exposure but can serve as indicators for further security assessments and improvements.

Example Findings:

  1. A survey result URL (https://example.com/survey/12345) was identified as publicly accessible, indicating a critical risk of unauthorized data exposure.
  2. Weak cipher suite RC4-SHA was detected in the TLS configuration of the domain, posing a high risk to the security and confidentiality of survey data.

Purpose: The Open Form Collection Scanner is designed to identify potential security vulnerabilities in JotForm, Typeform, and Google Forms by analyzing DNS records, HTTP headers, TLS configurations, and port scans. This tool aims to detect unprotected form submissions, insecure DNS configurations, weak TLS/SSL configurations, inadequate HTTP security headers, and open ports that could expose sensitive information or be exploited.

What It Detects:

  • Unprotected Form Submissions: Identifies forms that do not require authentication or encryption, which can lead to unauthorized access and data leakage.
  • Insecure DNS Configurations: Examines TXT, MX, NS, CAA, and DMARC records for misconfigurations, such as SPF records allowing open relaying.
  • Weak TLS/SSL Configurations: Inspects SSL/TLS certificates for outdated protocols (TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1) and weak cipher suites (RC4, DES, MD5).
  • HTTP Security Headers: Checks for the presence of essential security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  • Open Ports and Services: Scans common ports to identify open services that could be exploited, revealing potential vulnerabilities in network configurations.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., acme.com) - This is essential for performing DNS queries, HTTP requests, TLS/SSL inspection, and port scanning.

Business Impact: Ensuring the security of form submissions from JotForm, Typeform, and Google Forms is crucial as these platforms often handle sensitive user data. Unprotected forms can lead to unauthorized access, data leakage, and potential legal liabilities. The scanner helps organizations proactively identify and mitigate such risks, enhancing their overall security posture.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: Conditions where DNS records allow open relaying or TLS certificates use weak hash algorithms (e.g., MD5) and cipher suites (e.g., RC4).
  • High: Conditions where forms do not enforce authentication or encryption, exposing data to unauthorized users.
  • Medium: Conditions where HTTP security headers are missing or improperly configured, potentially leading to attacks such as cross-site scripting (XSS) or clickjacking.
  • Low: Conditions where open ports and services can be exploited but pose minimal risk due to the nature of the services running on them.
  • Info: Conditions that do not directly impact security but may indicate potential issues for future audits or compliance needs.

Example Findings:

  1. A JotForm submission page does not enforce HTTPS, allowing data transmission in plain text.
  2. The DNS configuration includes an SPF record that allows open relaying, exposing the domain to email spoofing attacks.

Purpose: The Beta User Testing Platforms Scanner is designed to evaluate the security posture of beta user testing platforms by examining their DNS configurations, HTTP responses, TLS implementations, open ports, and API endpoints. This tool aims to identify potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited during the beta phase, ensuring a secure environment for user testing.

What It Detects:

  • Security Headers Analysis: The scanner checks for the presence of critical security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. These headers are crucial for enhancing the security of web applications.
  • TLS/SSL Configuration Issues: It identifies outdated or insecure TLS versions (e.g., TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1) and weak cipher suites like RC4, DES, and MD5 that could compromise data encryption and integrity.
  • DNS Record Validation: The scanner examines TXT, MX, NS, CAA, and DMARC records to ensure proper configuration, including the verification of SPF, MX servers, name servers, CAA policies, DMARC policies, and DKIM records.
  • Open Ports and Services: By scanning common ports, the tool can identify open services and perform service fingerprinting to determine running software versions, which is essential for understanding the network infrastructure’s security posture.
  • API Endpoint Security: The scanner analyzes API endpoints for security headers and potential vulnerabilities, ensuring that authentication mechanisms are properly implemented and rate limiting is enforced to prevent abuse.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., acme.com). This input is essential as it serves as the basis for all subsequent DNS, HTTP, and TLS checks.

Business Impact: Assessing the security of beta user testing platforms is critical because a breach during this phase could lead to significant damage due to exposure of sensitive information or unauthorized access to production environments. The findings from this scanner can help prioritize patches and upgrades, mitigating potential risks associated with insecure configurations.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: This severity level applies when outdated TLS versions (e.g., TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1) are in use or weak cipher suites like RC4, DES, and MD5 are detected. These issues pose a significant risk to data security and integrity.
  • High: Inadequate or missing security headers can lead to high risks, as they are crucial for enhancing web application security.
  • Medium: Issues related to DNS record configuration that do not directly compromise security but could affect functionality or compliance should be considered medium severity.
  • Low: Informational findings such as unenforced rate limits on API endpoints carry a low risk unless explicitly required by the business for higher security standards.
  • Info: These are generally non-critical issues that provide additional context about the configuration but do not directly impact security.

Example Findings:

  1. A domain using TLSv1.0 and weak cipher suite RC4, which poses a critical risk as it significantly reduces data encryption strength.
  2. An API endpoint without proper X-Frame-Options header, exposing the platform to clickjacking attacks and thus carrying a high risk if used in a user testing environment where trust between users is crucial.