Skip to content

Healthcare

5 automated security scanners


Purpose: The HIPAA Compliance Scanner is designed to analyze company security documentation, public policy pages, trust center information, and compliance certifications to detect privacy controls, security controls, and breach notification practices that align with HIPAA regulations. This tool helps organizations assess their compliance status regarding patient data protection and ensure adherence to the stringent healthcare privacy standards set by HIPAA.

What It Detects:

  • Security Policy Indicators: The scanner identifies mentions of “security policy” within provided documents, including references to “incident response,” “data protection,” and “access control.”
  • Maturity Indicators: It verifies the presence of SOC 2 compliance certifications, ISO 27001 standards adherence, penetration testing activities, and vulnerability scan or assessment reports.
  • Privacy Controls: The scanner ensures that data handling practices comply with HIPAA privacy rules, validates patient information protection measures, confirms secure transmission and storage protocols are in place, and assesses employee training on HIPAA compliance.
  • Security Controls: It evaluates network security measures including firewalls and intrusion detection systems, reviews encryption methods for data at rest and in transit, examines physical security controls to protect sensitive information, and verifies incident response plans and breach notification procedures.
  • Breach Notification Practices: The scanner checks for clear breach notification policies, ensures timely communication of breaches to affected individuals, validates compliance with HIPAA’s breach notification requirements, and assesses the transparency and accuracy of breach disclosures.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., acme.com) - This is necessary for searching the company site to collect relevant security documentation and policy pages.
  • company_name (string): Company name for statement searching (e.g., “Acme Corporation”) - Used in search queries to identify relevant documents and statements related to HIPAA compliance.

Business Impact: This scanner is crucial as it helps organizations maintain robust cybersecurity measures, especially in the healthcare sector where patient data privacy and security are paramount. Compliance with HIPAA standards not only mitigates legal risks but also enhances trust among patients and stakeholders.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: The risk level is critical when there are clear violations of HIPAA regulations or significant gaps in compliance measures that could lead to severe breaches affecting patient data privacy.
  • High: High severity findings include major non-compliance with key HIPAA provisions, which still pose a significant risk but do not necessarily compromise the integrity of all patient data.
  • Medium: Medium severity risks involve medium-level non-compliance that might require corrective actions to align with HIPAA standards without immediate legal or compliance consequences.
  • Low: Low severity findings are those that have minimal impact on HIPAA compliance and pose little risk to organizational security posture.
  • Info: Informational findings pertain to general practices or policies that do not directly affect HIPAA compliance but could be improved for better cybersecurity management.

Example Findings: The scanner might flag a lack of clear breach notification procedures, outdated encryption methods, or inadequate physical security measures as high and critical risks respectively, depending on the severity of these gaps in compliance.


Purpose: The EHR_Security Scanner is designed to detect vulnerabilities in patient data protection and access controls by analyzing company security documentation, public policy pages, trust center information, and compliance certifications. Its primary objective is to ensure adherence to industry standards through the identification of security policies, maturity indicators, and compliance certifications.

What It Detects:

  • Security Policy Indicators: The scanner identifies the presence of security policies using patterns like “security\s+policy” and checks for incident response plans with phrases such as “incident\s+response”. It also verifies data protection measures through indicators like “data\s+protection” and ensures access controls are in place by searching for “access\s+control”.
  • Maturity Indicators: The scanner detects SOC 2 compliance certifications using patterns like “soc\s2”, identifies ISO 27001 standards with phrases such as “iso\s27001”, checks for penetration testing activities through indicators like “penetration\s+test”, and verifies vulnerability scanning or assessment practices using patterns like “vulnerability\s+(?:scan|assessment)”.
  • Company Security Documentation: The scanner analyzes internal security documentation when accessible, extracts relevant information from public policy pages and trust center sections.
  • Compliance Certifications: It identifies compliance certifications that demonstrate adherence to industry standards through certification references.
  • Data Source Analysis: The scanner scrapes specified paths on the company’s domain for relevant security information, collects breach disclosure statements and other related documents from various sections of the website.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., acme.com)
  • company_name (string): Company name for statement searching (e.g., “Acme Corporation”)

Business Impact: This scanner is crucial for maintaining the security posture of healthcare organizations by identifying and addressing vulnerabilities in patient data protection and access controls. It helps ensure compliance with industry standards, which is essential for protecting sensitive information and building trust with patients and regulatory authorities.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: Conditions that directly lead to severe breaches or significant risks to patient data security should be addressed urgently. This includes situations where critical policies are absent or ineffective, maturity indicators are not met, or there are clear indications of inadequate handling of sensitive information.
  • High: Issues that pose a high risk of unauthorized access or significant data exposure should be prioritized for remediation. This includes incomplete or poorly implemented security policies and the absence of necessary compliance certifications.
  • Medium: Medium severity issues may lead to potential vulnerabilities but do not compromise the overall security posture severely. Examples include partial compliance with standards or some gaps in policy implementation.
  • Low: Informal findings that might indicate minor oversights or areas for improvement, which are less critical but still need attention to enhance overall security practices.
  • Info: Informational findings provide context on current status and can be used for continuous monitoring and future improvements without immediate action required.

Example Findings:

  1. The company lacks a comprehensive data protection policy that explicitly addresses the handling of patient health information, which is critical for maintaining trust with patients and regulatory compliance.
  2. There are no documented incident response plans in place, posing significant risks if a breach occurs due to lack of preparedness and immediate action mechanisms.

Purpose: The Biomedical Research Security Scanner is designed to identify and assess potential vulnerabilities in research data protection and intellectual property (IP) security within organizations. By analyzing company security documentation, public policy pages, trust center information, and compliance certifications, the scanner aims to ensure adherence to necessary standards and protect sensitive biomedical research data from potential threats.

What It Detects:

  • Security Policy Indicators: The scanner identifies the presence of formal security policies, checks for incident response procedures, verifies data protection measures, and ensures access control mechanisms are in place.
  • Maturity Indicators: It confirms SOC 2 compliance certification, validates ISO 27001 standards adherence, detects penetration testing activities, and identifies vulnerability scanning or assessment processes.
  • Public Policy Pages: The scanner analyzes public-facing policy documents for security-related content, searches for incident response plans on official websites, evaluates data protection policies posted online, and checks access control measures described publicly.
  • Trust Center Information: It reviews trust center pages for security disclosures, examines trust center information for compliance certifications, validates trust center content for incident response procedures, and ensures trust center details include data protection and access controls.
  • Compliance Certifications: The scanner identifies SOC 2 certification mentions, confirms ISO 27001 standard references, detects penetration testing reports or mentions, and verifies vulnerability scanning or assessment documentation.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., acme.com)
  • company_name (string): Company name for statement searching (e.g., “Acme Corporation”)

Business Impact: Ensuring that organizations adhere to necessary standards and protect sensitive biomedical research data is crucial for maintaining the integrity and security of valuable research information. This not only safeguards intellectual property but also contributes to trustworthiness in scientific collaborations and compliance with regulatory requirements.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: The scanner identifies critical conditions where there are significant gaps in security policies, lack of incident response procedures, inadequate data protection measures, or uncontrolled access controls that could lead to severe breaches compromising sensitive research data.
  • High: Conditions exist where security policies are informal, compliance certifications are absent, or public disclosures on policy pages and trust centers do not adequately address critical security aspects.
  • Medium: There are indications of partial adherence to standards (e.g., some compliance certifications mentioned but not fully verified), or minor vulnerabilities in access controls that could be exploited with moderate effort.
  • Low: Informal policies, minimal public disclosures on security practices, and basic compliance with standard requirements without significant gaps.
  • Info: Non-critical findings such as outdated information on trust center pages or minor inconsistencies in data protection measures.

Example Findings: The scanner might flag a company that has not updated its privacy policy for over a year, indicating potential exposure to risks related to evolving data handling practices and user consent mechanisms. Another example could be the discovery of unverified SOC 2 compliance on the trust center page, which would necessitate further investigation into the organization’s commitment to upholding high standards in information security management.



Purpose: The Medical Device Security Scanner is designed to identify vulnerabilities and potential patient safety issues in medical devices by probing their network infrastructure for security weaknesses. This includes analyzing DNS records, HTTP headers, TLS configurations, open ports, and API endpoints.

What It Detects:

  • Insecure DNS Records: Checks for missing or improperly configured TXT, MX, NS, CAA, and DMARC records.
  • Weak HTTP Security Headers: Identifies missing or inadequate security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  • Vulnerable TLS/SSL Configurations: Scans for outdated or insecure TLS versions (TLSv1.0, TLSv1.1) and weak cipher suites (RC4, DES, MD5).
  • Open Ports and Services: Performs port scanning to identify open ports and services that may be vulnerable.
  • API Vulnerabilities: Analyzes APIs for potential security issues such as insecure authentication, lack of rate limiting, and improper error handling.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): The domain of the medical device or network to scan (e.g., device.example.com)
  • ip_range (string): The IP range to scan for open ports and services (e.g., 192.168.1.0/24)

Business Impact: This scanner is crucial for maintaining the security of medical devices, which are integral to patient care. Vulnerabilities detected can lead to unauthorized access, data leakage, or device malfunction, potentially compromising patient safety and healthcare operations.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: Conditions that directly affect critical aspects of the system’s functionality or where a failure could result in immediate harm or loss of life.
  • High: Conditions that significantly impact the security posture but do not necessarily lead to direct harm, such as unauthorized access to sensitive data.
  • Medium: Conditions that may indicate potential issues requiring attention but are less severe than high risks.
  • Low: Informative findings that provide insights into areas for improvement but do not pose immediate threats.
  • Info: General information about the system’s configuration, useful for understanding and maintaining the device.

If specific risk levels are not defined in the README, it can be inferred that critical risks are those with high impact and potential consequences, while lower risks might include less severe issues or areas needing improvement.

Example Findings:

  • “Missing or improper DMARC record: v=DMARC1; p=none” indicates a significant risk as it affects the domain’s email security.
  • “TLSv1.0 is enabled” and “RC4 cipher suite is used” highlight vulnerabilities in encryption protocols and suites that could be exploited by attackers.

Purpose: The Telemedicine Security Scanner is designed to ensure the security and privacy of remote consultations by detecting vulnerabilities in DNS configurations, HTTP headers, TLS implementations, open ports, and API endpoints. This tool helps identify potential risks that could compromise patient data during telemedicine sessions.

What It Detects:

  • Insecure DNS Configurations:
    • Checks for missing or improperly configured TXT, MX, NS, CAA, and DMARC records.
  • Weak HTTP Security Headers:
    • Ensures HSTS, CSP, XFO, and no-sniff headers are properly set to enhance security.
  • Vulnerable TLS/SSL Configurations:
    • Detects outdated TLS versions (TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1) and weak cipher suites like RC4, DES, and MD5.
  • Open Ports and Services:
    • Identifies open ports that could be exploited and running services with known vulnerabilities.
  • API Security Vulnerabilities:
    • Checks for exposed or insecure API endpoints and verifies secure authentication methods used by APIs.

Inputs Required:

  • domain (string): Primary domain to analyze (e.g., telemedicine.com)
  • url (string): Specific URL for detailed analysis (e.g., https://telemedicine.com/api)

Business Impact: Ensuring the security and privacy of remote consultations is crucial for protecting sensitive patient data from potential threats. This scanner helps healthcare organizations identify and mitigate risks associated with insecure telemedicine setups, thereby enhancing overall cybersecurity posture.

Risk Levels:

  • Critical: Conditions that directly compromise security or functionality critical to operation (e.g., missing HSTS header).
  • High: Conditions that pose significant risk but are not necessarily critical (e.g., use of outdated TLS versions).
  • Medium: Conditions that may lead to vulnerabilities but can often be mitigated with configuration changes (e.g., weak cipher suites).
  • Low: Informative findings that do not directly affect security or functionality but provide valuable insights for improvement (e.g., missing CAA record).
  • Info: Non-critical issues that are useful for informational purposes and may be addressed in future iterations of the system.

Example Findings:

  1. A critical finding might be a domain without HSTS enabled, which could lead to potential man-in-the-middle attacks.
  2. A high severity issue could involve an API endpoint using insecure authentication methods that hackers could exploit for unauthorized access.